This is the blog of Doleva Law
Here, we share our thoughts on topics of interest to our clients. The blog posting will be focused on Family Law issues relating to Divorce, Custody, Support and other aspects that are of interest for anyone needing a Family Law attorney.
It is evident that the majority of us use some form of social media now, whether it is Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn or another platform. We are often asked about how Social Media can impact you. While we specialize in family law, our clients will also ask about other types of cases, one such area is Social Media and your business. The general consensus is that you should be guarded in how you use Social Media with the understanding that once something is on the internet, it is nearly impossible to remove it. Keep this in mind as you post or comment as something you do now could impact you in years to come, whether it is for new employment or during a family law case. Social Media can be equally powerful as it can be troublesome. And it is all in how you use it, so please, keep that in mind as you engage via social media on the internet.
Social media provides an abundance of reasons for people to engage. People are able to reconnect, to network, to share current events, pictures and commonalities. Social media is not without its disadvantages: studies show that people have become addicted and are “living” more on the Internet than in reality. (The Dark Side of Facebook: “10 Reasons to be Careful” (vishalseafarer, edited by: Michele McDonough; updated: 2/1/2012).
The article, “The Dark Side of Facebook: 10 Reasons to be Careful,” highlights negative effects for social media users in relation to their job. Employees have been spending a lot of time on social media sites versus working, which they may not realize is monitored by their employer. Additionally, a lawsuit emerged in which one employee made disparaging remarks about her boss on Facebook and was subsequently terminated. This case has settled due to the overbearing restrictions in the Employee handbook. (NLRB’s “Facebook Firing” Case Against AMR Settles,” posted on February 10, 2011 by Brian Hall)
Social media has proven to be problematic for employers as well. If an employee is spending time on a social media site rather than doing his or her job, this is obviously costing the employer revenue. Further, with the multitude of “pop-up” advertisements, employees are sometimes duped into clicking on a prompt unintentionally which can lead to a virus, again costing the employer money.
Not surprisingly, some employers are attempting to utilize social media to their advantage as a manner in which to check-out the employee or screen the prospective employee. If an employer can look at an employee’s “page” or social media presence then the employer is arguably gaining insight into the personality or character of the employee or prospective employee. That aforementioned insight is exactly the problem, because “insight” of this type runs parallel to the fine line of privacy invasion. This privacy encroachment is more evident when the employee’s page or social media information is not public and the employer asks for the individual’s password. Such conduct begs the question of whether requesting an employee’s password is legal? The answer is, yes as of this writing nothing specifically prevents an employer from requesting an employee’s password here in Pennsylvania. However, Maryland has recently passed a bill, which prohibits employers from requesting passwords from an employee to a social media site.
It is well known that labor law prohibits employers from asking certain questions of their employees or certain questions to a prospective employee during an interview. The reason for this is to discourage workplace discrimination. A problem exists when an employer requests a Facebook password thereby entitling them to privileged and private information otherwise not accessible. Should an employer later terminate an employee, and they had access to private information from social media, the employee potentially has an argument based on discrimination for something learned from social media. Employers should have the applicant or employee sign a release and waiver to access such information.
Do the pros outweigh the cons for requesting an employee’s passwords? In my opinion they do not. First, the employer risks losing out on a qualified employee when during the interview process the request for a password is made and the employee does not comply and chooses to pursue another job. Second, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the potential for a discrimination suit greatly increases with the ability to learn of personal information.
What should you do if you, a Pennsylvania employee, are asked to produce your password for a social media site? That answer is not straightforward and depends on your specific situation. In the cases when you are interviewing for a job, given the economy and lack of jobs you may decide that your privacy takes a back seat to securing a job. However, you may also feel that if an employer requests this from you, that company may not be the environment in which you desire to work. If you are currently employed as an at-will employee, without an employment contract or collective bargaining agreement, and your employer requests your password, there is no statute in this Commonwealth that would prohibit the employer from terminating you if you declined to provide your password.
The bottom line is as an employer you should seriously consider whether you want to request social media passwords and speak to an attorney to be advised as to the possible repercussions prior to doing so. Employees or prospective employees, similarly, may wish to consult with counsel to obtain a better understanding of their own rights.
Continue Reading
By Kristen Doleva-Lecher
Published Originally in the 422 Business Adviser
Doleva Law is experienced in Mediation and our attorney, Kristen Doleva-Lecher is a qualified Mediator.
Q. What is mediation and how can it be utilized to benefit my company?
A. Mediation is a form of “Alternative Dispute Resolution” (ADR). ADR, which includes mediation, is a process in which disagreeing parties seek resolution through different techniques without initiating litigation.
Recently mediation has earned attention through the incorporation of mediation into the family law system. In Pennsylvania, any person who files a custody action must attend an information session on mediation with the other parent. Attorneys are not allowed to be involved in the session. Each county in Pennsylvania differs slightly in how each mediation program is organized.
Mediation is an exercise in encouraging conversation between disagreeing parties. The mediator is neutral and his or her only purpose is to encourage communication between the parties. There are no set rules, however since the parties are in charge they are free to establish their own rules. The goal of mediation versus litigation is to enable parties to make their own decisions, a judge or jury is not deciding the outcome. Through confidential negotiation and discussion the parties may reach an agreement that is acceptable to both of them. This method of dispute resolution can have significant advantages over traditional litigation in court.
Litigation in court means having lawyers, and adhering to the rules of evidence in what can be a long, drawn-out process. Mediation, on the other hand, does not require lawyers, and the parties are free to air out all of their concerns and complaints, not just those that could make it into evidence at a trial.
Mediation is less costly than litigation. Rather than each party retaining an attorney, the parties only need one mediator. Sessions typically consist of two-three hour increments although should it be necessary mediation can sometimes last for several sessions. A mediator should be certified, which means that usually an attorney or a psychologist has completed a 40-hour intensive training course. You can find a mediator through your local Bar Association or contact a local Mediation center.
Mediation has become a popular and effective method in addressing a variety of business issues. For example, mediation can be utilized in your business for:
• Human Resource issues dealing with employees
• Resolving partnership issues
• Renegotiating existing partnership agreements, or creating buy-out agreements
• Negotiating dissolution of businesses
• Resolving conflicts between business owners
Mediation will benefit your company in that:
• New businesses can move forward quickly with a clear agreement and understanding of job duties that are satisfactory to all parties.
• Established businesses can resolve problems that may have been lurking without the hassle or cost of litigation
• An in-house mediation provides a confidential and private atmosphere that does not extend beyond the perimeter of the company
• The parties are able to maintain an existing and working business relationship which often is thwarted by litigation.
Although some disputes will still require resolution in a courtroom setting, mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution are gaining increasing popularity as a viable method of settling disputes. As more lawyers and psychologists become certified to mediate cases, mediation will only become more prevalent. Business owners, like child custody litigants, will soon recognize the many benefits mediation has to offer.
Continue Reading